You're not smart enough
Now I have your attention this post should be named "You're not smart enough for short cuts because its not what counts"
There are many things about trading that I have always found a little strange. Particularly why reasonable smart and logical people apply thinking that in my experience is illogical and must be unique to the trading field. It seems that the thinking and process of "I'm a sharp cookie at XYZ therefore I can jump in live with hard earned money and go up against pros and succeed" is unique to trading only.
If that logic is fine then it should work in reverse. That is a Pro trader should be able to jump in "live" at another profession. I have made some good money the last couple of years trading so does anyone want me to build them a house, run a school or perform open heart surgery????????
How much sense would it be for the surgeon to jump to Pro musician in 3 months of dubious training. Or the Builder to turn to electrician with 3 months of reading how-to become a sparkie journal's. It would be madness. YET thats is exactly how I would say 99% of people come to trading. They spend a couple of months "learning" the trade. And then get in all sorts of bother because they find it hard. I say WTF did you expect. Where or what else can you succeed at without a long and structured curriculum to acquire skills and correct processes?
No wonder a whole sub-industry has sprung up about trading psychology. When what is really needed is more SKILLS through correct development and feedback. I get contacted often from punters having troubles trading. Almost all comment within the first few paragraphs that they "lack discipline". They are finding it hard to pull the trigger or take stops. No shit! Every thing is hard to do with out proper training. When most of your "patients" are dying on the table from incompetence it will get harder to pick up the scalpel. My first question to these dudes is alway what statistical or proven edge have you got for taking your trades. The answers are just as predictable as the discipline line, "gaps always fill", "breakouts on high volume are good entries" Blah Blah Blah. They have nothing in the way of deep understanding of how or why markets move. They are market dumb.
You obviously need some level of intelligence and motivation which success in one field may be an indication of possible success in another field but its the learning process that makes the diff in the end to those that have a chance (ability). In no other field outside of trading/investing does one try their hand at the task "live" without a LONG training period. Think surgery, nope years learning. Musician nope 10 years before they stand next to pro and perform. Sports, nope start in the back yard then junior sports then elite amateur then pro. Again about 10 years. Apprentice trade, you would never give an apprentice the hammer and saw to build a house without 3 years or probably more of supervision. Chess, same a period of learning against better and better opposition not grandmasters after 3 months.
The same should be for trading. What has the Musician, Surgeon, Pro sports person, Apprentice and Chess players all had before they went "live". Progressively harder resultsin simulation. The same should be for trading. No money down until you have results without risking real cash. No playing with the Pros until you have a positive expectancy system on Sim or back-test. A "trading plan" is rubbish without the skills to go with it. And you only get the skills with progressive practice. I have a couple of post coming up about how I would structure the Trembling Hands Day Trading Course. I will be giving it away for free because unlike the rest of the crap out there I couldn't sell it if I wanted to. For my way of thinking what is need to be consistently profitable is not a couple of books or a course or a piece of software or a live chat room for $7000 but time and practice. With that in mind, effort needed not short cuts, I expect no one to give a toss about the next 3 post.














